A judge's written authorization to search a specified place for specified things - and the exceptions that let police search without one are broad.
Looking for a lawyer rather than a definition? Skip to the state-by-state list of law firms for this.
A search warrant is an order signed by a judge or magistrate permitting a search. To obtain one, an officer submits a sworn written application - an affidavit - setting out the facts said to establish probable cause. The judge decides on that application, usually without anyone appearing for the person whose property is to be searched, which means the first opportunity to contest it normally comes long afterwards.
Two requirements are written into the Fourth Amendment itself and are the ones most often litigated. A warrant must be supported by oath or affirmation, and it must particularly describe the place to be searched and the things to be seized. That particularity requirement is the reason a warrant is not a general license: a warrant authorizing a search for a stolen vehicle does not authorize reading a diary, and a warrant for one apartment does not cover the building.
The more consequential practical point is that a great deal of lawful searching happens with no warrant at all. Consent, a search incident to a lawful arrest, items in plain view, certain vehicle searches, and genuine emergencies are all recognized bases for searching without one. Consent is the one a person actually controls: agreeing to a search waives the objection, and agreement given because someone believed refusal was not an option counts as consent unless it can later be shown otherwise.
Digital devices are treated differently from the containers they physically resemble. The Supreme Court has held that police generally must obtain a warrant before searching the contents of a mobile phone seized during an arrest, and separately that acquiring historical cell-site location records from a carrier is a Fourth Amendment search. A phone in a pocket is not, for this purpose, like a wallet.
Anyone shown a warrant is entitled to read it, and the two things worth reading are the address and the list of items - a search that goes materially beyond either is the kind of thing a lawyer can act on later, and only if someone noticed. Refusing consent to a search that is not covered by a warrant is not a crime and is not evidence of guilt, though physically obstructing a search may be a separate offense. Where a case depends on what a search produced, the affidavit behind the warrant is a document a defense lawyer will want early: warrants are challenged on what the officer told the judge, and that is only visible on the paper.
Worried about the cost? A lawyer can be hired for one part of a case only (limited-scope representation), may be paid from what a claim recovers (contingency fee), or may be free through a pro bono program or legal aid; a court can also waive its own filing fees.
Choose your state to see law firms for this in the city where we list the most; your city may be under “other cities”, A to Z.
Other entries in the same area of law, each written from the same primary sources.