The constitutional bar on being tried twice for the same offense after an acquittal or conviction, or punished twice for it - when jeopardy attaches, what counts as the "same offense", the mistrial and appeal exceptions, and why a state and the federal government may each prosecute the same act.
Looking for a lawyer rather than a definition? Skip to the state-by-state list of law firms for this.
The Fifth Amendment provides that no person shall be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense. The clause protects against a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal, a second prosecution after conviction, and multiple punishments for the same offense in a single proceeding. An acquittal is final however wrong the verdict, and the prosecution may not appeal it, retry the defendant, or relitigate a fact the acquittal necessarily decided in a later prosecution for a different offense. Jeopardy attaches when the jury is sworn or, in a bench trial, when the first witness is sworn, and in a plea when the court accepts it; a dismissal before that point permits refiling.
"Same offense" is tested by the elements, not the conduct: two statutory provisions are the same offense unless each requires proof of a fact the other does not, so a single act can lawfully be charged and punished under two statutes with different elements, and a lesser-included offense is the same offense as the greater. The clause does not bar a retrial after a conviction is reversed on appeal for an error at trial - the defendant's appeal is treated as a continuation of the original jeopardy - but it does bar retrial after a reversal for insufficient evidence, which is the equivalent of an acquittal. A mistrial declared over the defendant's objection permits retrial only where there was manifest necessity, a hung jury being the classic case; a mistrial the defendant requested permits retrial unless the prosecutor deliberately provoked it.
Under the dual-sovereignty doctrine, the state and the federal government are separate sovereigns with separate offenses, so an acquittal in one does not bar prosecution in the other for the same act, and two states may each prosecute; the federal government limits successive prosecutions by internal policy, not by law. Civil consequences of the same act - a civil fine, forfeiture, professional discipline, deportation, sex-offender registration - are not "punishment" for double-jeopardy purposes unless they are so punitive as to be criminal in effect. The clause is a personal right that is waived if not raised before trial.
Double jeopardy is a question for the lawyer at charging and plea stage, not after a second trial has begun: whether multiple counts are really one offense, whether a plea to one charge will bar the others, whether a hung jury means retrial, and whether a federal case may follow a state one are all answerable in advance. A person acquitted in one court and then charged by another sovereign for the same act should not assume the first verdict ends it; a person facing what looks like a second prosecution by the same sovereign should raise the bar in writing before trial or lose it.
Worried about the cost? A lawyer can be hired for one part of a case only (limited-scope representation), may be paid from what a claim recovers (contingency fee), or may be free through a pro bono program or legal aid; a court can also waive its own filing fees.
Choose your state to see law firms for this in the city where we list the most; your city may be under “other cities”, A to Z.
Other entries in the same area of law, each written from the same primary sources.