A way to settle a divorce out of court in which both spouses and their lawyers agree in writing to negotiate, and the lawyers must withdraw if the case goes to court.
Looking for a lawyer rather than a definition? Skip to the state-by-state list of Collaborative Law firms.
In a collaborative divorce, each spouse hires a lawyer trained in the collaborative process, and everyone signs a participation agreement committing to resolve the case by negotiation, with full voluntary disclosure of relevant information, instead of going to court. The defining term is disqualification: if the process breaks down and either spouse goes to court, both collaborative lawyers must withdraw, and each spouse has to hire new counsel for the litigation. That shared cost gives everyone an incentive to settle.
The process often brings in neutral professionals: a financial specialist to gather and analyze assets, income and support, a divorce coach to help with communication, and a child specialist to bring the children's perspective into a parenting plan. Discussions take place in joint meetings. The agreement reached is then written up and submitted to the court, usually as an uncontested divorce, so a judge still enters the final judgment.
Collaborative law differs from mediation. In mediation a single neutral helps the spouses negotiate, and their lawyers, if they have any, can go on to represent them in court if mediation fails. In collaborative law each spouse has an advocate, and the lawyers cannot. The Uniform Law Commission's Uniform Collaborative Law Act, adopted in a number of states, sets out the participation agreement, the disqualification rule, a privilege for collaborative communications, and a duty on each lawyer to make reasonable inquiry into whether there is a history of a coercive or violent relationship between the parties before the process begins. The American Bar Association has concluded that the model is ethically permissible when the client gives informed consent to its limits (ABA Formal Opinion 07-447 (2007)).
Collaborative divorce suits spouses who can share information honestly and want to control the outcome and the cost. It is usually not suitable where there has been domestic violence or coercion, or where one spouse is likely to hide assets. Ask a prospective lawyer about their collaborative training, what the participation agreement says about withdrawal and disclosure, and how the neutral professionals are chosen and paid.
Worried about the cost? A lawyer can be hired for one part of a case only (limited-scope representation), may be paid from what a claim recovers (contingency fee), or may be free through a pro bono program or legal aid; a court can also waive its own filing fees.
Choose your state to see Collaborative Law firms in the city where we list the most; your city may be under “other cities”, A to Z. A state marked “Family Law” has no Collaborative Law listing yet and opens the broader page.
Other entries in the same area of law, each written from the same primary sources.