The federal statute allowing someone to sue a state or local official personally for violating their constitutional rights.
Section 1983 is the vehicle for most constitutional claims against state and local government in the United States. It creates no rights of its own; it provides a way to enforce rights that already exist under the Constitution or federal law, against a person acting under colour of state law - a police officer, a corrections officer, a school or county official.
Two features shape almost every case. The defendant must have been acting under state authority, which is what separates these claims from ordinary disputes between private parties. And a local government body is not liable simply because it employed the person: liability attaches where the violation followed an official policy, a custom, or a failure to train amounting to deliberate indifference, rather than on the ordinary employer-liability principle people expect.
The defence that decides many of these cases is qualified immunity, which protects an official unless the right violated was clearly established at the time in a way a reasonable official would have understood. It is frequently resolved before trial, and it is the reason two cases with similar facts can end very differently.
These are specialist claims and the reasons to get advice early are evidentiary rather than tactical: body-camera footage, incident reports and dispatch records are retained under agency schedules that can be short, and a preservation request made early is sometimes the difference between a provable claim and an unprovable one. Notice requirements for claims against public bodies are also strict and separate from anything else - and they can be very much shorter than people expect.
These directory pages each list at least one currently published law firm. The list is generated when this page loads, so a page whose listings have lapsed drops out rather than becoming a dead link.