A voluntary agreement in a Chapter 7 case to remain personally liable on a debt - usually a car loan - that the discharge would otherwise wipe out, in exchange for keeping the property; what it costs, the court's role, and the alternatives of redemption and simply continuing to pay.
A Chapter 7 filer with a car loan or other secured debt has to decide what to do about the property. The statement of intention filed with the petition offers three choices: surrender the property and discharge the debt; redeem it by paying the lender its current value in a lump sum; or reaffirm the debt. Reaffirmation is an agreement, signed by the debtor and the creditor and filed with the court before the discharge is entered, that the debt will be repaid as though the bankruptcy had not happened. In return the debtor keeps the property and, in the case of a car loan, keeps the loan reporting to the credit bureaus.
The price is the loss of the discharge as to that debt. If the car is later repossessed or wrecked, the debtor owes the deficiency personally, exactly the liability bankruptcy exists to remove. Because of that, the Code surrounds reaffirmation with formalities: the agreement must contain extensive disclosures of the amount, the interest rate and the debtor's income and expenses; a debtor represented by counsel needs the lawyer's certification that the agreement is voluntary and imposes no undue hardship; an unrepresented debtor must attend a hearing at which the judge decides whether to approve it; and where the debtor's own budget shows the payment cannot be afforded, a presumption of undue hardship arises. The debtor may rescind at any time before the discharge or within a short period after the agreement is filed, whichever is later.
Many debtors and lawyers choose a fourth path the statute does not name: keep paying the loan without reaffirming. The lender keeps its lien and may repossess if payments stop, but the debtor keeps the discharge and can walk away from the car at any time without a deficiency. Whether a lender will accept that - some contracts make the bankruptcy itself a default - and whether the loan will keep reporting depend on the lender and on the law of the circuit, which is why the decision is made case by case.
A lawyer will usually resist reaffirming anything but a modest, affordable car loan on property the person genuinely needs, and will refuse to certify an agreement the budget does not support - a refusal that is itself a protection. The right question is what the property is worth against what is owed: reaffirming a loan larger than the car's value re-creates a debt the discharge was about to erase, and redemption or surrender may cost far less over time.
Choose your state. Each link opens the directory page for the city in that state with the most currently published law firms in this practice area; a +n beside the city is how many other cities in the state also have one. The list is generated when this page loads, so a state whose listings have lapsed drops out rather than becoming a dead link.